| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 14 post(s) |
Quest Liem
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
0
   |
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:44:00 -
[1] - Quote
I believe in it is a definite imbalance if one group can field more people then the other. We play this game to be fair and have fun, how fun is it to be outnumbered 50 to 1? Not very, in the best interest of this game CCP should come up with a way to limit the number of combatants in a signal system. I mean we do need to be fair and give someone s sporting chance. |
Quest Liem
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:53:00 -
[2] - Quote
Scooter McCabe wrote:Quest Liem wrote:I believe in it is a definite imbalance if one group can field more people then the other. We play this game to be fair and have fun, how fun is it to be outnumbered 50 to 1? Not very, in the best interest of this game CCP should come up with a way to limit the number of combatants in a signal system. I mean we do need to be fair and give someone s sporting chance. So you want to penalize alliances that have a better culture in terms of attracting players and getting them to show up for fleet fights. Sorry CCP cannot upgrade your personality.
How is that penalizing any alliance? We are making the game more enjoyable for both. You enjoy the game by out numbering your opponent? Is not that not an I win button? I am bring issues that would make the game more fair to everyone who pays to play the game. A 30 on 30 fight is a lot more enjoyable then something like 300 on 50. Do you not agree? |
Quest Liem
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:55:00 -
[3] - Quote
Gossamer DT wrote:Quest Liem wrote:I believe in it is a definite imbalance if one group can field more people then the other. We play this game to be fair and have fun, how fun is it to be outnumbered 50 to 1? Not very, in the best interest of this game CCP should come up with a way to limit the number of combatants in a signal system. I mean we do need to be fair and give someone s sporting chance. what? even sided fights? is your sandbox full of catnip by chance?
Image that? even sided fights who in the world would enjoy that? |
Quest Liem
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:57:00 -
[4] - Quote
Ser Berus wrote:Quest Liem wrote:Scooter McCabe wrote:Quest Liem wrote:I believe in it is a definite imbalance if one group can field more people then the other. We play this game to be fair and have fun, how fun is it to be outnumbered 50 to 1? Not very, in the best interest of this game CCP should come up with a way to limit the number of combatants in a signal system. I mean we do need to be fair and give someone s sporting chance. So you want to penalize alliances that have a better culture in terms of attracting players and getting them to show up for fleet fights. Sorry CCP cannot upgrade your personality. How is that penalizing any alliance? We are making the game more enjoyable for both. You enjoy the game by out numbering your opponent? Is not that not an I win button? I am bring issues that would make the game more fair to everyone who pays to play the game. A 30 on 30 fight is a lot more enjoyable then something like 300 on 50. Do you not agree? Yes, because you see I signed up to play WOW and furthermore,
Yes a very intelligent reply, we are here trying to fix this game and make in more enjoyable and yet you reply with this, that has nothing to do with EVE. Next time please don't hit the reply button unless you have something to say |
Quest Liem
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:01:00 -
[5] - Quote
Gossamer DT wrote:Quest Liem wrote:Scooter McCabe wrote:Quest Liem wrote:I believe in it is a definite imbalance if one group can field more people then the other. We play this game to be fair and have fun, how fun is it to be outnumbered 50 to 1? Not very, in the best interest of this game CCP should come up with a way to limit the number of combatants in a signal system. I mean we do need to be fair and give someone s sporting chance. So you want to penalize alliances that have a better culture in terms of attracting players and getting them to show up for fleet fights. Sorry CCP cannot upgrade your personality. How is that penalizing any alliance? We are making the game more enjoyable for both. You enjoy the game by out numbering your opponent? Is not that not an I win button? I am bring issues that would make the game more fair to everyone who pays to play the game. A 30 on 30 fight is a lot more enjoyable then something like 300 on 50. Do you not agree? I think you are looking for hi sec and war dec's we are tearing about titans in this thread, can you go find a lets be even sided fights thread some where else? TIA
Oh im sorry, the other 80 plus pages of worth while post were all about titans. But thank you for proving my point, in your lack of a decent reply. it seems that other people can blob titans and its not fair but its ok if we blob sub capitals in EVE. Nice one side argument |
Quest Liem
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:21:00 -
[6] - Quote
Ser Berus wrote:
only so many ways to point out that this isn't how a multiplayer sandbox game works, and there are fabulous opportunities for cancelling your account and playing something that's better suited for your obsessive need of goodfites.
Like wise to you to sir, You wined and CCP is adjusting the Titans, you could have just unsubscribed and found a better game to get you good fights as well. Instead you did not and complained to CCP about it. |
| |
|